page counter

Why was this blog created?

All further in-house efforts to further justice in the US justice system are futile. These efforts are only worthwhile to the degree that they provide additional documentation of the widespread corruption of the US justice system.

Our focus must be on the international community.

In November 2010 the United Nations will review for the first time ever the Human Rights record of the United States. Corruption of the justice system was the core of reports filed by Human Rights Alert and others for the April 2010 deadline.

In August 2010 the US State Department is scheduled to respond on the reports, and in November 2010 the UN will conduct the review session and issue the report, and set goals, which the US would be asked to reach between 2010 and the next scheduled review in 2014.

Between now and November 2010, we must focus on informing and lobbying the nations that sit on the review panel, to ensure that the most effective report is issued.

This blog was created in hope that the French Government would support a UN UPR report that calls upon the US federal government to provide equal protection under the law to all who reside in the United States.

Please call or write your elected representatives. Please ask that the French Government support in November 2010 the issuance of a UPR report by the United Nations, which calls upon the US government to abide by its duties and responsibilities pursuant to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

S'il vous plaît appelez ou écrivez vos représentants élus. S'il vous plaît demander que le soutien du gouvernement français en Novembre 2010, la publication d'un rapport par les Nations Unies, qui invite le gouvernement américain à respecter ses obligations et responsabilités en vertu de la Déclaration universelle des droits de l'homme.

S'il vous plaît signer la pétition - Libérer Richard Fine

RICHARD FINE was arrested on March 4, 2009 and is held since then in solitary confinement in Twin Tower Jail in Los Angeles, California, with no records,  conforming with the fundamentals of the law, as the basis for his arrest and jailing.

Richard Fine - 70 ans, ancien procureur des États-Unis, a montré, que les juges de comté de Los Angeles avait pris «interdit» les paiements (appelé par les médias "pots de vin").Le 20 Février 2009, le gouverneur de Californie a signé «immunités rétroactives" (amnesties) pour tous les juges à Los Angeles. Moins de deux semaines plus tard, le 4 Mars, 2009 Richard Fine a été arrêté en audience publique, sans mandat. Il est détenu depuis en isolement cellulaire à Los Angeles, en Californie. Aucun jugement, condamnation ou la peine n'a jamais été inscrit dans son cas.

S'il vous plaît signer la pétition - Libérer Richard Fine:

Sunday, July 18, 2010

10-07-18 Discussion sur le forum de discussion OAK

Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CAComment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA just now
Delete CommentDear Lynette: As for the solution - the evidence from Los Angeles County, and beyond, in the past couple of decades shows that we cannot expect it to come from the United States government. The highest level officers of the US Department of Justice are fully informed on corruption of the judiciary in Los Angeles County, California. Yet, they refuse to take action, even when prodded by US Congress. It has therefore been Human Rights Alert's policy for sometime to focus its efforts on increasing international awareness of the level of abuse that US citizens are subjected to by their own government. Hundreds of thousands of reads and downloads from Human Rights Alert were registered from over 85 nations around the globe. Between now and November 2010, our efforts should be focused on lobbying nations who sit on the Human Rights Council of the United Nations - to affect an honest and effectual report by the United Nations in its first ever review of Humane Rights in the United States. [1] We must define specific areas of abuse, such as false imprisonments - the focus of Human Rights Alert's report, the intimidation of Human Rights counsel - the focus of OAK's report, or the retaliation against whistle-blowers - the focus of ITHACA's report. With it, we must propose specific goals and effective corrective actions, which should be easily monitored, which the report would request the United States to undertake between 2010 and the next review - in 2014. It is not that such report is the end all in the matter. However, such report is very likely to get publicity, which is much wider than anything that we may be able to generate on our own. jz LINKS [1] 10-04-24-The-Road-Ahead-from-April-to-the-November-2010-review-of-the-US-Human-Rights-by-the-United-Nations shttp://www.scribd.com/doc/31433805/
Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CAComment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA just now
Delete CommentDear Dr Jackson: . The case of Richard Fine was used only as an example. The vast majority of the victims are blacks and latinos, and about a third of them were estimated to have been still juveniles at the time of their false imprisonment. . As quoted in the paper forwarded to you some weeks ago: 1) Reports by PBS in 2001 related to the Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000) provided various estimates of the number of those who were falsely imprisoned in Los Angeles County as 8,000 to 30,000. 2) Unofficial report by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean of the UC Irvine Law School, and renowned constitutional scholar in 2001 stated upon review of the matter: “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” 3) Unofficial report by Prof David Burcham, Dean of Loyola Los Angeles Law School in 2001 stated: “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." 4) Official report by the Blue Ribbon Review Panel stated in 2006: "Innocent people remain in prison". It also recommended "external investigation" of the Los Angeles Superior Court, which the US government so far has refused to conduct. , In view of the above, I would be grateful if you could please likewise provide the references to the "general proposition of accountants, historians, journalists, gumshoes, etc. checking against paper, receipts, and original records." . As far as I could tell, you were making baseless statements by the seat of your pants, in a matter that is, based on solid evidence, a Human Rights disgrace of historic proportions. . Truly, Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGOhttp://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/ http://inproperinla.com/http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documentshttp://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.
c. lynnette thomasComment by c. lynnette thomas 59 minutes ago
so, with all this blogging and boggling, exposing the issues, where is the chattering about viable solutions? I very much support the idea that comments here should be kept under the 250 word limit rule, as comments and blogs are a might different. anything more that needs said in a comment, a link can be provided to the corresponding blog. that way, we'll be able to sort through all the info with much more ease and, together, devise strategies to begin to resolve the many issues. I would love to aid in that endeavor, but get rather lost in the exhausting comments here. just some thoughts on how to streamline things here and make it more productively functional for all our purposes! :)
Dr. A. D. JacksonComment by Dr. A. D. Jackson 5 hours ago
I only stated a general proposition of accountants, historians, journalists, gumshoes, etc. checking against paper, receipts, and original records. I did not imply Richard Fine's papers were in order as I have extreme misgivings concerning his being locked up. Andrew

No comments:

Post a Comment